The Curious Case of the Snollygoster and the Evolution of Political Language

Have you ever wondered how much power words truly hold in the realm of politics? Politicians often meticulously choose their words, aiming to shape the reality they wish to create. But does this strategy genuinely work? Let's delve into the fascinating world of political language, exploring its origins, evolution, and surprising impact.

What Exactly is a Snollygoster?

One intriguing word that often surfaces in discussions about political discourse is "snollygoster." According to the Oxford English Dictionary, a snollygoster is a dishonest politician. However, a 19th-century newspaper editor offered a more colorful definition: a snollygoster is someone who seeks office regardless of party platform or principle, achieving victory through sheer monumental… tnal (a word whose meaning is now lost to time).

The Power of Words in Politics

Words are undeniably central to politics. Politicians understand the need to control language, recognizing its power to influence public opinion and shape narratives. A pivotal moment in the history of political language occurred in 1771 when the British Parliament allowed newspapers to report the exact words spoken in the debating chamber. This decision, spurred by the bravery of Brass Crosby, a champion for freedom of the press, marked a significant step toward transparency and accountability in political discourse.

The Unexpected Origin of "President"

To truly grasp the intricate relationship between words and politics, let's journey back to the United States of America shortly after its independence. The newly formed nation faced the challenge of determining what to call its leader, George Washington. This question sparked intense debate in Congress, with various suggestions put forth, including:

• Chief Magistrate Washington
• His Highness George Washington
• Protector of the Liberties of the People of the United States of America
• Even King (elected for a fixed term)

After three weeks of deliberation, the House of Representatives, wary of granting Washington too much power, proposed the humblest title they could devise: President. At the time, "president" simply meant someone who presides over a meeting, akin to a foreman of a jury. It lacked the grandeur and authority we associate with the term today.

The Senate initially objected, arguing that such a modest title would undermine Washington's ability to command respect when signing treaties and meeting foreign dignitaries. However, a compromise was reached: the title of "President" would be used for now, but with the explicit understanding that the Senate did not endorse it. They believed that civilized nations typically bestowed titles of respectability upon their chief magistrates, not a seemingly insignificant term like "president."

The Irony of Reality

Fast forward to the present day, and the title "President of the United States of America" carries immense weight and prestige. This transformation is largely due to the realities of power associated with the office, including control over a vast military arsenal and the world's largest economy. Reality and history have imbued the title with a grandeur that the Senate initially sought.

Interestingly, the Senate's concern about appearing singular has also been dispelled. Today, 147 nations have a president, largely because they want to emulate the power and influence associated with the office.

The Ultimate Lesson

Politicians may strive to shape reality through carefully chosen words, but ultimately, reality has a far greater impact on the meaning and perception of those words. The evolution of the title "President" serves as a powerful reminder that language is not static; it is constantly evolving, influenced by historical events, societal shifts, and the ever-changing dynamics of power.